Showing posts with label EVIDENCE. Show all posts
Showing posts with label EVIDENCE. Show all posts

Friday, 28 September 2012

What kind of Evidence do we need in Surgery?

In percutaneous coronary intervention, the key to stent patency and therefore prevention of clinical events is inhibition of platelet function. Aspirin is the best know inhibitor of platelet function & has been around forever. Over the past 10 years, we have had many more - clopidogrel, abciximab, ticlopidine, pasugrel and now ticagrelor - each one shown to be superior to the last in good quality randomised controlled studies.


Thursday, 10 November 2011

Endoscopic Vein Harvesting and the Disingenuity of NICE.

In the coronary artery bypass (CABG) operation, saphenous vein is harvested from the leg for use as a conduit to bypass stenoses in coronary arteries. This harvesting can be done in 2 ways - open harvest i.e. using an incision that is as long as the length of vein required or endoscopic harvest using a 3cm incision above the knee to harvest any length of vein.

Saturday, 16 April 2011

RUNNING TO KEEP STILL

The results of an unprecedented number of trials involving cardiac surgical ops have been published recently. Most have been in the NEJM here, here and here. Many, including the results of the Partner Cohort A trial  were announced for the first time at the recent annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology. I have commented on the results of the Partner trial in my last post. Many of these trials have

Sunday, 20 February 2011

CRITICAL APPRAISAL

I read a lot of cardiothoracic and cardiac related abstracts every week. Occasionally I may read the whole paper. When I do this, I critically appraise the paper in my head and usually summarise on the blog. I have decided therefore that I ought to start a formal journal club. Every week I will pick a paper and formally critically appraise it. There are a number of formal critical appraisal sheets available on various Evidence Based Medicine websites. Examples include the excellent BestBet topics, and the authoritative centre for evidence based medicine at Oxford University and the new NHS public health website.
So watch this space.

Sunday, 6 February 2011

Tuesday, 30 November 2010

EVIDENCE

JAMA -- Mediastinoscopy vs Endosonography for Mediastinal Nodal Staging of Lung Cancer: A Randomized Trial, November 24, 2010, Annema et al. 304 (20): 2245

I used to practice both cardiac and thoracic surgery until August 2007. After the appointment of 2 purely thoracic surgeons to our department, 2 of us who practiced both disciplines had to give up thoracic surgery. For various reasons that I won't go into now, I decided to give up thoracic surgery and stick to cardiac. Although this paper will not affect my practice, it still gives me great pleasure to see a well conducted surgical trial that produces good evidence that surgeons can use in their everyday practice - even though the results of the study means less surgery. We need more of these.